1448   Not possible to determine the restriction on number of BRCBs if rptMod=both

This tissue has following status: green

Proposer: Herb Falk , SISCONET

Links:

Page:

Clause:

Paragraph:

Category: Issue for edition 2 of this part

Issue: During the IOP, SCTs should not determine the split of BRCBs/URCBs since the maximum number of reports does not differentiate. The Max is explicit enough. Need a mechanism to differentiate the number of BRCBs/URCBs.

Proposal: WG10 decided that a capability will be added to allow the declaration of the max brcbs. This capability will only be required in the case where rptMod=both. Otherwise, the capability will not be present.

Attachments:
    Note: To see attachments you have to log-in first.

Discussion Created Status
?
Ballot until Editor
Agreed to add an optional attribute maxBuf to ConfReportControl to indicate the maximal number of BRCB instances.
ConfReportControl.maxBuf shall be an optional attribute of type unsignedInt, no default. Its value shall not be greater than sibling attribute ConfReportControl.max.

If ConfReportControl.maxBuf is missing, the limit on the number of BRCB instances is ConfReportControl.max.

Applicable for Amd 2.1
08 Dec 15 green ABB
Wolfgang Wimmer
Applicable for Amd 2.1. 05 Nov 15 final proposal ABB Switzerland
Christian Frei
Agreed to add an optional attribute maxBuf to ConfReportControl to indicate the maximal number of BRCB instances.

ConfReportControl.maxBuf shall be an optional attribute of type unsignedInt, no default.

Attribute maxBuf not be greater than sibling attribute ConfReportControl.max.

If ConfReportControl.maxBuf is missing, the limit on the number of BRCB instances is ConfReportControl.max.
26 Oct 15 red ABB Switzerland
Christian Frei