447   Inconsistency in requiring FC as a parameter of services

View All Issues for Part 7-2 (2003)

If you want to see other tissues for this part.

This tissue has following status: final proposal

Proposer: Stanley A. Klein ,

Page:

Clause: 9 and 10

Paragraph:

Category: Issue for edition 2 of this part

Issue: Service parameter tables are inconsistent in their requirement for FC as a parameter. FC is required as a parameter for control block related services but not for data related services. 8-1 maps FC essentially as part of the object reference for both data and control blocks, but there is nothing in the tables specifying that FC be provided for data-related services (except GetAllDataValues).

Proposal: Make the parameter tables consistent. Either define FC as part of the object reference (in which case it should be removed from the control block service parameter tables) or as not part of the object reference (in which case it should be added to the data-related service parameter tables).

Discussion Created Status
?
 Ballot until Editor
Accepted in principle.

Attribute of CB do not have FC in Ed2. See IEC61850-7-2 Ed2 - CDV		 15 Mar 09 final proposal Siemens
Thierry Dufaure
Accepted.

To make the service tables consistent add the parameter "FunctionalConstraint" in all data and control block related services.

Changes in the document will be made if final proposal will be accepted.
15 Apr 07 final proposal 2007-05-11 SCC
Karlheinz Schwarz